Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84334 (PAT)

Anuj Diwedi @ Anuj Kumar Dwivedi @ Anuj Dwivedi v. The State Of Bihar

CR. MISC./83586/2024 · 2025-07-16

Smt Soni Shrivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83586 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-316 Year-2023 Thana- KATEYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Anuj Diwedi @ Anuj Kumar Dwivedi @ Anuj Dwivedi S/O Sri Mukta Prasad Dwivedi R/O Ganga Nagar, Poni Road, Near Tata Tower, Brahma Nagar, P.S.- Ganga Ghat, Shuklaganj, District- Unnao (UP) ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Patna 2. Sneha Tiwari Wife of Anuj Diwedi @ Anuj Kumar Dwivedi @ Anuj Dwivedi R/O Ganga Nagar, Poni Road, Near Tata Tower, Brahma Nagar, P.S.- Ganga Ghat, Shuklaganj, District- Unnao (UP). At Present R/O Ameya West, P.O. Mahuawa, P.S.- Kateya, Dist.- Gopalganj. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satyendra Rai, Adv. For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 7 16-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. Nobody appears on behalf of the informant despite issuance of notice. 3. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 498(A), 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 4. Petitioner, who is husband of the informant, is said to have tortured upon her physically and mentally and ousted her from the matrimonial home in association of his family Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83586 of 2024(7) dt.16-07-2025 2/2 members over the dowry demand. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations made in the FIR are not correct and as a matter of fact, the petitioner has always been ready to keep his wife with due dignity and honour and it is due to the fact that the informant’s father fell ill and hence, the informant by her own vilition is staying in her maike for serving him. 6. Learned APP for the State, however, opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 7. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within four weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 316 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C/ 482 (2) of the BNSS, 2023. divyanshi/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T