Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84331 (PAT)

Md. Saddam Shah v. The State of Bihar

CR. APP (SJ)/5355/2024 · 2025-02-20

Rajiv Roy

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.5355 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2023 Thana- SHEKHPURA COMPLAINT CASE District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== Md. Saddam Shah Son of Md. Kamal shah village- Hussainabad, Ps- Aariyari, dist- Sheikhpura ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Guddu Dhobi Son of Maro Rajak village- Hussainabad, Ps- Aariyari, dist- Sheikhpura ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Rabindra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl. PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 4 20-02-2025 Heard Mr. Rabindra Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl P.P. 2. The appeal has been preferred:- “on behalf of the appellant for quashing the order dated 05.01.2024 passed in SC/ST P.S Case No. 98 of 2023 passed by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge- 1st Sheikhpura, whereby and where under the Learned Court ordered to register complaint case against the appellant only due to the Investigating Officer has submitted final form under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 379, 354(B), 504, 506, 34 of Indian Penal Code and Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.5355 of 2024(4) dt.20-02-2025 2/2 section 3(i) (x) (r) (s) SC/ST Act is false in connection with SC/ST Complaint Case No. 26 of 2023 (Guddu Dhobi Versus Md. Kamal Shah & Others) before the Learned Additional Sessions Judge- 1st, Sheikhpura and also Complaint SC/ST Case No. 23 of 2024 passed by the Learned Court below.” 3. Learned Counsel for the appellants after some arguments submits that he will be raising some points at an appropriate stage before the Court concerned and for the reason, he may be permitted to withdraw the petition. 4. Learned Spl. P.P. submits that the said liberty is always to an accused/appellants herein. 5. As the prayer for withdrawal has been made, both the Interlocutory Application and the Criminal Appeal stands disposed of. sharun/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T