Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8433 (MAD)

C. Mathivanan v. S. Jeevanantham

CMP/32256/2025 · 2026-07-16

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.M.P.No.32256 of 2025 in C.M.A.Sr.No.187209 of 2025 N.ANAND VENKATESH, J This petition has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 170 days in preferring the above appeal. 2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner. 3. Notice sent to first respondent has been returned with an endorsement ‘no such person’. 4. Mr.J.Michael Visuvasam, learned counsel, takes notice for respondents 3 and 4. 5. Satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed and the delay of 170 days in preferring the above appeal is condoned. 6. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and post it for admission in due course. Registry is also directed to print the name of Mr.J.Michael Visuvasam, learned counsel for respondents 3 and 4 at the time of admission. It is made clear that the petitioner will not be entitled for interest for the delay period in the event of enhancement of compensation. 16.07.2026 gm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis