SHARADDHA ALIAS MANJULA W/O BASAVRAJ KUNTOJI v. GAVISIDDAPPA S/O GUDADIRAPPA ALAWANDI
WP/107384/2024 · 2025-11-13
Anant Ramanath Hegde
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 84320 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 84320 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15537 WP No. 107384 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 107384 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SHARADDHA @ MANJULA, W/O BASAVRAJ KUNTOJI, AGE. 34 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. KALADAGI, TQ. AND DIST. BAGALAKOT, NOW AT MADHURA CHETANA PARK COLONY, BEHIND MADHURA CHETANA PARK, BADAMI NAGAR, KESHWAPUR, HUBBALLI, TQ. AND DIST. DHARWAD-580 023.
… PETITIONER (BY SRI. H.N. GULARADDI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. GAVISIDDAPPA S/O GUDADIRAPPA ALAWANDI, AGE. 63 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. NEAR BANNIKATTI, GADAG ROAD, TQ. AND DIST. KOPPAL-583 231.
2.
ANANDAPPA S/O GUDADDIRAPPA ALAWANDI, AGE. 64 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. GUDIDIRAPPA CHAL, GADAG ROAD, TQ. AND DIST. KOPPAL-583 231.
… RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED ON I.A. NO.II DATED 26/10/2024 IN O.S.
NO.106/2023 PENDING BEFORE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KOPPAL, WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-C, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.11.19 12:20:56 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15537 WP No. 107384 of 2024
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE)
The application is filed to implead daughter of respondent No.2/defendant. The suit is filed for partition by the brother against the brother. The petitioner who claims to be the daughter of respondent No.2/defendant seeks to come on record.
2. The Trial Court held that the daughter of the defendant who is alive is not a necessary party.
3. This court does not find any error in the order. Hence, the following: ORDER The writ petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE
CLK CT:BCK LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 68