Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84319 (PNJ)

SAKILA AND ANOTHER v. KARNAIL SINGH AND OTHERS

FAO/6124/2018 · 2025-05-12

Lok Adalat Bench

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Daily Lok Adalat Bench No.1 512 FAO-6124-2018 SAKILA AND ANOTHER V/S KARNAIL SINGH AND OTHERS Present:- None for the appellants. Mr. Sanjeev Kodan, Advocate for the Insurance Company. *** Since none had been appearing on behalf of the appellants, notices were issued to them to appear in person before this Forum to explore the possibility of settlement. The report shows that the appellant No.1 has been served through her husband whereas appellant No.2 has been duly served through husband. However, despite service neither the appellants nor their counsel has put in appearance before this Forum. Noticing the aforesaid act and conduct of the appellants, it seems that they are not interested in pursuing this case. Accordingly, this case is consigned to the record room with liberty to the appellants to revive the same by filing an appropriate application before the appropriate Forum if such necessity arises. Copy of this order be sent to the appellants at the given address. (J.C. VERMA) PRESIDENT 12.05.2025 (DARSHAN SINGH) Atul MEMBER Atul Kumar Tripathi 2025.05.27 15:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document