SHRI VEERABHADRAPPA S/O CHINAGUDEPPA GANACHARI v. SHRI MANJUNATH CALLING HIMSELF AS S/O VEERABHADRAPPA GANACHARI
WP/108257/2025 · 2025-11-07
Anant Ramanath Hegde
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 84306 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 84306 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15266 WP No. 108257 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 108257 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1.
SHRI VEERABHADRAPPA S/O CHINAGUDEPPA GANACHARI, AGE. 66 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. SANGOLLI VILLAGE-591 115, TQ. BAILHONGAL, DIST. BELAGAVI.
2.
SMT. SHINGAVVA W/O VEERABHADRAPPA GANACHARI, AGE. 56 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. SANGOLLI VILLAGE-591 115, TQ. BAILHONGAL, DIST. BELAGAVI.
3.
SHRI MALLIKARJUN S/O VEERABHADRAPPA GANACHARI, AGE. 29 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. SANGOLLI VILLAGE-591 115, TQ. BAILHONGAL, DIST. BELAGAVI.
… PETITIONERS (BY SRI. BALAGOUDA A. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SHRI MANJUNATH CALLING HIMSELF AS S/O VEERABHADRAPPA GANACHARI, AGE. 27 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. DOMBARKOPPA VILLAGE-591 115, TQ. KITTUR, DIST. BELAGAVI.
2.
SMT. CHANNAVVA CALLING HERSELF AS W/O VEERABHADRAPPA GANACHARI, AGE. 60 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. DOMBARKOPPA VILLAGE-591 115, TQ. KITTUR, DIST. BELAGAVI.
… RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15266 WP No. 108257 of 2025
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 16/09/2025 ON IA NO.IV PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BAILHONGAL, IN O.S. NO.264/2023 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the direction may be issued to the Trial Court to dispose of the matter as early as possible.
2. Petition for such a prayer to decide the suit of the year 2023 is not tenable.
3.
Learned counsel the petitioners after arguing for some time, seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the petition.
4. Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE
CLK CT:BCK LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 16