Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84304 (KAR)

BABU TUKARAM JADHAV v. VISHALAXI W/O VISHWANATH RAMADURG

WP/107355/2025 · 2025-10-15

Anant Ramanath Hegde

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13918 WP No. 107355 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 107355 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: BABU TUKARAM JADHAV, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. GADI ONI, NARAGUND TALUK, NARAGUND, DIST. GADAG-582 207. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANTOSH B. MANE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. VISHALAXI W/O VISHWANATH RAMADURG, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. ANGANAWADI WORKER, R/O. NARAGUND, TQ. NARAGUND, DIST. GADAG-582 207. 2. NETAJI BABURAO TETENAVAR, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC. SECURITY EMPLOYEE, R/O. MUNAVALLI POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, BVB COLLEGE, VIDHYANAGAR, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580 021. 3. THE CHIEF OFFICER, TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, NARAGUND, DIST. GADAG-582 207. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. CHETAN MUNNOLI, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE ORDER 15.09.2025 REJECTING THE APPLICATIONS FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER IA NO.8 AND 9 IN OS NO.19/2020 PENDING ON THE FILE OF LEARNED CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NARAGUND VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPLICATIONS AT IA NO.8 AND 9 VIDE ANNEXURE-G AND H. CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.10.18 07:57:16 +0100 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13918 WP No. 107355 of 2025 THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) Since it is submitted that the original suit is disposed of and the present petition is filed challenging the order passed on the interim application, the petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, same is dismissed as infructuous. The petitioner is entitled to raise the contentions raised in the present petition in the manner known to law in subsequent proceedings arising from the same suit. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE CLK CT:BCK LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 28