Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8430 (AP)

Boya Chinna Ranganna v. The Station House Officer

WP/5353/2020 · 2025-09-14

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010090322020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5353/2020 Between: 1. BOYA CHINNA RANGANNA, S/O BOYA LAKSHMANNA AGED ABOUT 45YRS 2. BOYA RAMALAKSHMI, W/O B. RANGANNA AGED ABOUT 37YRS, BOTH ARE R/O D.NO.1/2815-126 VENKATAPURAM VILLAGE YEMMIGANUR MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NANDAVARAM POLICE STATION KURNOOL DISTRICT 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 5. A.LAVANYA, W/O A.SRIRAMULU, R/O T.B.P. COLONY, YEMMINAGUR KURNOOL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. B SARVOTHAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent No.1 in interfering with petitioners land to an extent Ac. 1.13 cents situated in Sy.No.112-A2 of Mugathi village of Nandavaram Mandal, Adoni Revenue Division, Kurnool District without 2 there being any authority to interfere in civil dispute which is violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the respondent No.1 not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of petitioners land to an extent Ac.1.13 cts situated in Sy.No.112-A2 of Mugathi village of Nandavaram Mandal, Adoni Revenue Division, Kurnool District.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that the Police are not interfering with the civil disputes between the parties. 3. Sri B.Sarvotham Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit, a direction may be given to the Police not to interfere with the civil disputes between Petitioners and the Respondent No.5. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Police not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:15.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.5353 of 2020 Dt.15.09.2025 Dinesh