HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C) No. 291 of 2025 Md. Zakir Hossain ………Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Tripura & Ors. ……..Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sankar Kr. Deb, Sr. Advocate. Mr. S. Datta, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. Debbarma, Addl. G.A. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD ORDER 28.05.2025 Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. [2] This present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:- “I) Issue a Rule upon the respondents and each one of them to show cause as to why a Writ of Mandamus and/or in the nature thereof shall not be issued directing the respondents and each one of them to grant the same and similar benefits to the petitioner as granted under the Judgment & Order (Oral) in Annexure 7 & Annexure 8 supra and the Judgment in W.A. No.114 of 2022 and W.A. No. 113 of 2022 (Annexure 9 supra); and II) After hearing the parties be pleased to make the Notice/Rule absolute in terms of I) above;” [3] When the case is called, Mr. Sankar Kr. Deb, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. S. Datta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner represents before this Court that the subject matter involved in this petition is squarely covered by the Order dated 23.05.2025 passed in WP(C) No. 278 of 2025 and prayed to consider the present petition in the light of the above mentioned WP(C) No. 278 of 2025. [4] In view of the same, since the subject matter involved in this petition is squarely covered by the order dated 23.05.2025 passed in WP(C) No. 278 of 2025, the present petition is also disposed of following the observation as has been made in the WP(C) No. 278 of 2025. Accordingly, Registry is directed to do the needful enclosing the order passed on 23.05.2025 in WP(C) No.278 of 2025 along with this. As a sequel, miscellaneous application(s), pending if any, shall stand closed. JUDGE Paritosh SABYA SACHI GHOSH Digitally signed by SABYASACHI GHOSH Date: 2025.05.30 13:33:17 +05'30'