HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8966 of 2025 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sumit Daga, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner has filed the present petition assailing the order rejecting the application filed under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and the order passed by appellate court. 3. During the pendency of the writ petition, suit was decided finally on 25.07.2025 by rent authority. 4. Learned counsel appearing the respondents submits that case has become infructuous as the order passed by rent authority on 25.07.2025 is appealable under Section 35(1) of Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Urban Premises Tenancy Act, 2021. He further submits that by an amendment application, petitioner wants to amend the writ petition and challenge the order passed by rent authority on 25.07.2025. 5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, this Court finds that the petitioner has remedy of filing an appeal under Section 35 of the Act of 2021 and the amendment application filed in the writ petition is not maintainable. 6. Writ petition is misconceived and stands dismissed. October 10, 2025 V.S.Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aishwarya Pratap Singh, Zain Abbas Counsel for Respondent(s) : Sumit Daga (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Mohammad Usman .....Petitioner(s) Dalip Singh And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad