- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15725 WP No. 100162 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 100162 OF 2025 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: 1. HAVINAL BHEEMAPPA S/O. SANNA ERANNA SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LR’S SHRI. HANUMAYYA S/O. HAVINAL BHEEMAPPA AGE: 71 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 2. SHRI. YELLAPPA S/O. HAVINAL BHEEMAPPA AGE: 68 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 3. SHRI. MARIYAPPA S/O. HAVINAL BHEEMAPPA AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, ALL ARE R/O. 64, HALEKOTE, TAL: SIRUGUPPA DIST: BALLARI 583122. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. JAGADISH PATIL, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15725 WP No. 100162 of 2025 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY (LA-1 AND 3) DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHAN SOUDA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDI, BANGALURU. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BALLARI, DIST: BALLARI-583122. 3. THE REVENUE OFFICER, TEKKALKOTE SIRUGUPPA, TAL AND DIST BALLARI-583122. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS PRAYING TO: A. ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT BEARING NO. SUM/KUM/BHUSWA/66/2011-12 DATED 23/08/2017 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-G WITH RESPECT TO THE PETITIONER LAND ARE SY.NO.38/B3 AND SY. NO.39/A2 CONCERNED, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. B. ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, DIRECTING RESPONDENT NO. 2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF PETITIONER DATED 13/06/2017 VIDE ANNEXURE-H, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15725 WP No. 100162 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, by order dated 24.09.2025, had passed the following direction: “Three week’s time is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the office objections. If the office objections are not complied by 31.10.2025, re-list this matter on 06.11.2025 for dismissal of the petition.” 2. Despite the directions issued by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the office objections have not been complied with till date. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected for non- compliance with the office objections. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE VNP CT:ANB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 198