SHRI T S VENKATESH S/O T SUBRAMANY v. SRI MAHESHAPPA S HURAGI
MFA/101056/2025 · 2025-11-11
Chillakur Sumalatha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 84271 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 84271 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15392 MFA No. 101056 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 101056 OF 2025 (MV-I) BETWEEN:
SRI. T. S. VENKATESH S/O. T. SUBRAMANY, AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: HOTEL BUSINESS, R/O: D. NO.28/1 4TH MAN, 8TH CROSS, P. J. EXTN, DAVANAGERE.
(OWNER OF BIKE REG NO. KA 17/EF-1715 ) …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SURESH SHETTEMMANAVAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. MAHESHAPPA S. HURAGI, AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: ASST EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IN KRIDL DAVANAGERE, NOW @ MRUTHYUNJAYA NAGAR, 3RD CROSS, RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI.
2.
THE DIVISONAL MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD., REGIONAL OFFICE, 2ND FLOOR, ARIHANTA PLAZA, KUSUGAL ROAD, HUBBALLI – 23, (INSURER OF BIKE REG NO KA-17/W-9801).
3.
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD., REGIONAL ROAD, HUBBALI – 23.
(INSURER OF BIKE REG NO KA-17/EF-1715) …RESPONDENTS
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, 1988, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 22.10.2024 IN MVC NO.421/2019 PASSED BY THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, RANEBENNUR AND MAY KINDLY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE SAID JUDGMENT AND AWARD OF RS.8,19,250/- BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15392 MFA No. 101056 of 2025
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA)
1. The appeal was filed in the month of February-2025 and till now, office objections are not complied.
2. This Court does not find any grounds to grant further time.
3. Therefore, the appeal stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE
RHR/CT-ASC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6