2025:JHHC:12724 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 1392 of 2024 -------- MD. IMAM ANSARI, Aged about 30 years, Son of Md. Azaj Ansari, Resident of Chudihar Mohalla, Thana Road, P.O. & P.S. Chatra, District- Chatra. ... … Petitioner(s) Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. The Chief Secretary of the State Government, Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi. 3. Secretary Personnel Admin Reform and Rajbhasha at Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi. 4. Deputy Commissioner, Chatra, Ρ.Ο. & P.S. Chatra, District- Chatra. 5. Sub-divisional Officer, Chatra, P.O. P.S. Chatra, District- Chatra. 6. The District Supply Officer, Chatra, P.O. & P.S. Chatra, District- Chatra. … … Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jayant Kumar Pandey, Advocate Mr. Anwar Hussain, Advocate For the State : Mr. S. K. Tiwari, SC-I -------- Order No.06 /Dated: 28th April 2025 The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying for a direction upon the respondent-authorities for confirmation and regularization of the temporary post of the Driver of the petitioner who is working as Driver since 2011 in the District Collectorate, Chatra. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of the Regularization Rule of 2015 as amended in the year 2019 the case of this petitioner has not been considered though he has represented several times before the concerned respondent. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that since no counter affidavit has been filed as such, the petitioner may be directed to approach 4th Respondent for redressal of his grievance. 4. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and looking to the prayer made in the instant writ application, the same is 2025:JHHC:12724 2 hereby disposed of by directing the 4th Respondent to treat this writ application as representation and take a decision with regard to regularization of service of the petitioner in accordance with Regularization Rule of 2015 as amended in the year 2019. It goes without saying that since it is a case of regularization, the concerned respondent- authority should pass a speaking order within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The petitioner is also directed to serve the copy of this writ application to the 4th Respondent at the earliest so that his grievance can be redressed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Amit