Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84254 (PNJ)

JYOTI LAL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/8195/2025 · 2025-08-18

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8195-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 18.08.2025 JYOTI LAL AND ANOTHER .....PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL. Present: Mr. Narender Kumar Rana, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Jasjit Singh Rattu, DAG Punjab. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) CRM-W-1069-2025 Allowed as prayed for. CRWP-8195-2025 The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus thereby directing the official respondent no.1 and 2 for the protection of the life and liberty of petitioner at the hands of private respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied in case a direction be issued to respondent No.2 to look into the JATIN 2025.08.19 17:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8195-2025 -2- representation dated 19.04.2025 (Annexure P-1), within a time bound manner. In view of the above, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2/Senior Superintendent of Police, Pathankot to look into the representation dated 19.04.2025 (Annexure P-1) and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of three weeks by passing a speaking order. A copy of order so passed be supplied to the petitioner within one week thereafter. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 18.08.2025 JUDGE jatin Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No JATIN 2025.08.19 17:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document