JYOTI LAL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/8195/2025 · 2025-08-18
Sandeep Moudgil
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 84254 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 84254 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
118
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8195-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 18.08.2025
JYOTI LAL AND ANOTHER
.....PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
.....RESPONDENTS
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL. Present: Mr. Narender Kumar Rana, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Jasjit Singh Rattu, DAG Punjab.
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) CRM-W-1069-2025 Allowed as prayed for. CRWP-8195-2025 The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus thereby directing the official respondent no.1 and 2 for the protection of the life and liberty of petitioner at the hands of private respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied in case a direction be issued to respondent No.2 to look into the JATIN 2025.08.19 17:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-8195-2025 -2- representation dated 19.04.2025 (Annexure P-1), within a time bound manner. In view of the above, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2/Senior Superintendent of Police, Pathankot to look into the representation dated 19.04.2025 (Annexure P-1) and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of three weeks by passing a speaking
order. A copy of order so passed be supplied to the petitioner within one week thereafter.
(SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 18.08.2025
JUDGE jatin Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No JATIN 2025.08.19 17:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document