- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15275 WP No. 106484 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 106484 OF 2023 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. SHILPA D/O. IRAYYA MUKASHIVANNANAVAR @ VASTRAD W/O. VEERAYYA KAMATAR, AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC: UNEMPLOYED, R/O: DUMMAWAD, TQ: KALAGHATAGI, DIST: DHARWAD – 580 002, NOW RESIDING AT UNKAL, TQ: HUBBALLI, DIST: DHARWAD – 580 002. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H. M. DHARIGOND, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, PUBLIC INDUSTRIAL DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY SECRETARY, CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT, M. S. BUILDING, BENGALURU – 560 001. 3. THE ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETYS OFFICE, (INDUSTRY AND DAIRIES ) NO. 1 ALIASKAR ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 052. 4. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KARNATAKA MILK FEDERATION LTD., DR. MARIGOUDA ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 052. 5. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, DHARWAD CO-OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS, UNIO FEDERATION LTD., LAKAMANAHALLI, INDUSTRIAL AREA P. B. ROAD, DHARWAD, DIST. DHARWAD – 580 002. … RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. GIRIJA S. HIREMATH, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. A.D.KULKARNI, ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5) Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15275 WP No. 106484 of 2023 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND DIRECT THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO APPOINT THE PETITIONER ON COMPASSIONATE GROUNDS BY CONSIDERING THE APPLICATION DATED 04-04-2022 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING B GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. Learned counsel Shri Aravind D.Kulkarni appearing for the respondent Nos.4 and 5 submits that the petitioner has received the compensation in terms of the document that is produced before the Court. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would not dispute the position with regard to the receipt of the compensation. 3. In the light of receipt of compensation, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. The petition stands disposed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE VNP/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 49