- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17684 WP No. 102332 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 102332 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: RAMACHANDRA MAHABALESHWAR HEGDE, AGE 80 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O: HANDIMANE, SALKAI, SIRSI, UTTARA KANNADA-581402. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. VENKATAGIRI R. HEGDE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, HEAD OF THE TRIBUNAL SENIOR CITIZENS ACT, SIRIS SUB DIVISION, SIRSI, UTTARA KANNADA-581340. 2. SMT.VEENA HEGDE, NO.37, 3RD CROSS ROAD, AJJAPPA BLOCK, 9TH MAIN ROAD, DINNURU, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE-560032. 3. KUM. VANI R.HEGDE, C/O. SMT.VEENA HEGDE, NO.37, 3RD CROSS ROAD, AJJAPPA BLOCK, 9TH MAIN ROAD, DINNURU, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE-560032. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.HANUMAREDDY, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF THE AWARD PASSED BY RESPONDENT DATED 27.03.2024 PRODUCED HEREIN at ANNEXURE-C. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRL. HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17684 WP No. 102332 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following prayer: “A. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the execution of the award passed by respondent No.1 dated 27.03.2024, produced herein as Annexure-C. B. Direct respondent No.1 to take appropriate measures to keep the petitioner’s name alone in column No.9 in re-unioned all agriculture properties of the revenue documents. C. Pass any such other appropriate writ, order or direction that deems to be fit under the circumstances explained above.” 2. Learned AGA on instructions would submit that warrant has been executed and the children of the petitioner have now appeared before the Assistant Commissioner. 3. In that light, the Assistant Commissioner is directed to take the issue to its logical conclusion. Reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail of such remedy as available in law, the petition stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE VNP / CT: ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36