Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8423 (ALL)

RAMESH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/826/2025 · 2025-01-22

Ajay Bhanot

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:10800 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 826 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ramesh Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravi Sahu Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Harshit Pandey Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Heard Sri Ravi Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent No. 1 and Sri Harshit Pandey, learned counsel counsel for the respondent no. 2. The petitioner claims that he is entitled to benefits of Assured Career Progression (ACP), group insurance, revised pension and arrears of revised pension along with interest. He has made a representation in this regard but to no avail. Learned counsel for the respondents submit that the matter requires determination of facts by the competent authority as per law in the first instance. However, they fairly contend that his claim for ACP, group insurance, revised pension and arrears of revised pension along with interest is liable to be decided by the competent authority in a reasonable time frame. In light of the aforesaid submissions and without going into the merits of the case, the respondent no. 2- Nagar Ayukta, Nagar Nigam, Kanpur Nagar is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner regarding ACP, group insurance, revised pension and arrears of revised pension along with interest as per law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with a fresh copy of the representation. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 22.1.2025 Pravin Digitally signed by :- PRAVIN VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad