Samswarup Yadav @ Ramsurup Yadav @ Samruvrup Yadav v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./5819/2025 · 2025-02-25
Prabhat Kumar Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8422 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8422 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5819 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1149 Year-2024 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Samswarup Yadav @ Ramsurup Yadav @ Samruvrup Yadav S/o- Late Chandradev Yadav Village- Nima anjan murgada PS- Madanpur District- Aurangabad Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rupa Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dashrath Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 25-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a), 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, 45 liters country made liquor was recovered from a motorcycle, of which, this petitioner is owner.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he has been falsely implicated in this case. As he is owner of the motorcycle, he has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is 74 year old hence he is not able to drive the motorcycle. The seized motorcycle was given to others to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5819 of 2025(2) dt.25-02-2025 2/2 go to the house of relative. No incriminating material has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner and he is no way connected with the aforesaid recovery. The petitioner claims clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State submits that 45 liters illicit liquor was recovered from a motorcycle of which the petitioner is owner.
6. Considering the recovery of huge quantity of liquor and the fact that petitioner is owner of the seized motorcycle, anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is rejected.
Prakash/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T