Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84218 (ALL)

JANG BAHADUR YADAV AND 30 OTHERS v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER

WRIA/11409/2025 · 2025-08-07

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:134628 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11409 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jang Bahadur Yadav And 30 Others Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Aniruddh Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel. 2. By means of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution petitioners have prayed for following reliefs: "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondent No. 2 to declare the results of the applicants/petitioners by disclosing the actual marks in the recruitment test/examination as well as category of the petitioners. II. Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in to the facts and circumstances of the case." 3. Learned Standing Counsel submitted that petitioners may be directed to make representation before the concerned competent authority regarding individual grievance separately and if they do so, competent authority may further be directed to dispose of the same in accordance with law. 4. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with the direction to the petitioners to move their individual representations before the competent authority ventilating their grievances, and in the event such representations are moved within a period of four weeks from today, the competent authority is directed to consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law within a further period of four weeks. Order Date :- 8.8.2025 A. V. Singh Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad