IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RSA No.222 of 2018 Decided on: 04.04.2025 Lila Devi ...Appellant Versus Ravinder Kumar Chopra ...Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge Whether approved for reporting? For the appellant: Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate. Satyen Vaidya, Judge CMP No.597 of 2025 & RSA No.222 of 2018 No reply is sought to be filed on behalf of the respondent. 2. Mr.Nitin Thakur, Advocate, representing the respondent has submitted, on instructions, that the contents of the application are admitted by the respondent. The land, in respect of which the decree under challenge in RSA No.222 of 2018 was passed, has now been purchased by the appellant/defendant for consideration by way of a registered sale deed No.1214 dated 06.05.2023 in the office of Sub Registrar, Solan on 06.05.2023. 2 3. In view of the admission made by the respondent/plaintiff, the decree passed in favour of the respondent/plaintiff on 20th March, 2017 in Civil Suit No.43/1 of 1998 by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No.1, Solan and affirmed vide judgment and decree dated 28.02.2018, passed by learned Additional District Judge-II, Solan in Civil Appeal No.1- ADJ-II/13 of 2018 has been rendered in-executable as the respondent/plaintiff has ceased to have any right on the land. 4. In this view of the matter, no orders are required to be passed in RSA No.222 of 2018 and the same is accordingly disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya ) Judge 4th April, 2025 (vt)