MANISH YADAV ALIAS MANISH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./2003/2025 · 2025-03-26
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8420 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8420 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2003 of 2025
------ Mainsh Yadav @ Manish Kumar, aged about 39 years, son of Jagdish Yadav, resident of Village-Mahthadih, P.O.- Domchanch Bazar, P.S.-Domchanch, Dist.-Koderma
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate
: Ms. Pinki Kumari, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Santosh Kr. Shukla, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 26.03.2025
Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Domchanch P.S. Case No.115 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 126(2)/ 127(2)/ 76/ 115(2)/ 117(2)/ 109/ 324(4)/352/351(2)/79/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder the members of the informant party and the only allegation against the petitioner is of assaulting Saroj Devi with a danda. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and for the selfsame occurrence, from the side of the petitioner, Domchanch P.S. Case No. 116 of 2024 has been registered. It is then submitted that the petitioner had no intention to kill anybody and the injury sustained is grievous in nature. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is
submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs. 20,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Koderma, in connection with Domchanch P.S. Case No.115 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu/Gunjan-