Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84188 (ALL)

JAGDISH CHAND SHARMA AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/26608/2025 · 2025-09-07

Amitabh Kumar Rai, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 26608 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Shri Prem Kumar Chaurasia, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State- respondents and Shri Aditya Bhushan Singhal, learned counsel for respondent no.4 - Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed praying inter alia for the following relief: "i. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent authorities i.e. respondent no. 4 to pay the balance amount to the petitioners on the basis of the Government Order dated 11.03.2025 issued by the respondent no. 1. ii. Issue a writ or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent authorities to decide the applications/representation dated 21.04.2025 (Annexure No. 6 to the present writ petition) to the petitioners within stipulated time fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer that objection/application 21.04.2025 may be decided by respondent No.4 expeditiously. 5. Shri Aditya Bhushan Singhal, learned counsel for respondent no.4 - Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority states that in case the said application has not yet been decided, the same would be decided as per law. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prem Kumar Chaurasia Counsel for Respondent(s) : Aditya Bhushan Singhal, C.S.C. Jagdish Chand Sharma And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) keep the writ petition pending consideration and call for a counter affidavit. 7. Therefore, without adverting on the merits of the case, with the consent of parties, this writ petition is disposed of finally with a direction to the competent officer of the fourth respondent i.e. Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority to consider the application of petitioner and pass appropriate order, strictly in accordance with law, within three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, but certainly after taking into account the Government Order dated 11.03.2025. September 8, 2025 NLY WRIC No. 26608 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad