Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84163 (KAR)

MRS. MANALI W/O VISHAL SINGH SAVANT v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/101447/2025 · 2025-10-29

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14652 WP No. 101447 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 101447 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: MRS. MANALI W/O VISHAL SINGH SAVANT, AGE. 24 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. #267/3, GANESH MARG SHASHI NAGAR, HUKKERI, PIN CODE- 590001. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHANTESH S. HIREMATH, AND SRI. PRATAP S. YADAV, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME ANJANEY NAGAR, BELAGAVI, PIN CODE- 560001. 2. THE DIST MAGISTRATE AND DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BELAGAVI, PIN CODE. 590001. SUPERINTENDENT OF PRISON CENTRAL JAIL KALABURGI, PINCODE. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KHADEBAZAR POLICE STATION, BELAGAVI, PIN CODE- 590003. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS PRAYING TO KINDLY ALLOW THE PETITION KINDLY ISSUE A DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE DETENTION ORDER RAKESH S HARIHAR Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Date: 2025.10.31 06:27:32 +0000 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14652 WP No. 101447 of 2025 DATED ON. 30/4/2024 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 IN NO. MAG/GOONDA ACT/DTN/01/2024 IS PRODUCED ANNEXURE- A AND QUASH ORDER DATED. ON. 7/5/24 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN HD 182 SST 2024 BENGALURU PRODUCED AT, ANNEXURE-C AND QUASH ORDER OF CONFIRMATION ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 DATED. ON 3/6/24 IN HD 182 SST 2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-G AND IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. This Court, by order dated 22.09.2025, had passed the following direction: “1. Three weeks’ time is granted to comply with the office objections. 2. If the office objections are not complied with by 16.10.2025, re-list on 29.10.2025 for dismissal under the caption ‘dismissal’.” 2. Despite the directions issued by this Court, the office objections have not been complied with till date. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected for non-compliance of the office objections. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE KGK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 53