RAJENDRA GIRI AND 89 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/11423/2025 · 2025-08-10
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 84161 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 84161 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:135495 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11423 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajendra Giri And 89 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Man Mohan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayers:-
"(A) Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding and directing the respondent No.2, 3 and 4 to permit the petitioners to continue as security guard in Government Medical College, Azamgarh and pay their salary month to month. (B) Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding and directing the respondents to not replace the petitioners from the post of security guard by making fresh temporary/outsource appointment of security guards in the Government Medical college, Azamgarh."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.1 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Sri R.P. Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondents, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners as no objection made on behalf of learned
Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Petitioners are directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.1 within one week from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.1, Principal Secretary, Department of Medical Education, Government of U.P., Lucknow is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6.
With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. . (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Order Date :- 11.8.2025 Atul Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad