Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84154 (PAT)

Sunil Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./85629/2024 · 2025-02-14

Prabhat Kumar Singh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85629 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-313 Year-2022 Thana- KOTWA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Sunil Kumar S/O Kamaldev Rai Resident of Village- Bhopatpur Vishunpur, Ward No.- 02, Police Station- Kotwa (Bhopatpur), District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Karandeep Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 14-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kotwa (Bhopatpur) P.S. Case No. 313 of 2022, a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 448, 341, 323, 324, 307, 354 (B), 337, 379, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per F.I.R., petitioner and other accused persons are alleged to have assaulted informant with lathi, danda, iron rod and farsa. Petitioner is alleged to have assaulted informant’s husband with farsa on his head due to which he got injured. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is admitted land dispute between Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85629 of 2024(2) dt.14-02-2025 2/2 both the parties. Doctor has found only two injuries which falsifies the prosecution case. Both the parties are agnates. Petitioner is in custody since 24.09.2024 having one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail. 5. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is allowed, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of court of learned A.C.J.M., 12th, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Kotwa (Bhopatpur) P.S. Case No. 313 of 2022. Ranjeet/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T