RAJU ALIAS RAJ KUMAR AND ORS v. ANAND MOHAN SHARAN, IAS AND ORS
COCP/3145/2024 · 2025-09-10
Vikram Aggarwal
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 84148 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 84148 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
217
COCP-3145-2024 (O&M)
Date of decision: 10.09.2025
Raju @ Raj Kumar and others
…Petitioners V/s Sh. Anand Mohan Sharan and others
…Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Deepak Sonak, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Anuj Garg, DAG, Haryana.
*** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that judgment dated 13.03.2024 passed in CWP-2158-2020 titled as Ashish Sharma and others vs. State of Haryana and others, on the basis of which the writ petition (CWP-18085-2015) filed by the petitioners had been disposed of vide order dated 20.03.2024, has been stayed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and the matter is still pending adjudication.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the same, he may be permitted to withdraw the present contempt petition with liberty to file afresh, if the occasion so arises, after the decision of the Supreme Court of India.
3.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL)
JUDGE September 10, 2025 vcgarg
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No VIKAS CHANDER 2025.09.11 17.21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document