Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84146 (ALL)

ARUN SAXENA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

NA528/30902/2025 · 2025-08-20

Sanjay Kumar Pachori

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:143415 Court No. - 74 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 30902 of 2025 Applicant :- Arun Saxena Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Pratik Pandey,Ujjawal Satsangi,Vaibhav Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ravi Shankar Tripathi Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J. Shri Ravi Shankar Tripathi, Advocate pointed out that he has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party No. 2 in the Registry on 20.8.2025, which is not on the record. Office is directed to trace out the same and place it on record. Heard Shri Ujjawal Satsangi, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Abhishek Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and Shri Ravi Shankar Tripathi, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2. The present application under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the applicant to quash the orders dated 21.11.2024 and 10.7.2025 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Sambhal at Chandausi in Maintenance Case No. 1096 of 2024, arising out of an application under Section 144 BNSS (Section 125, Cr.P.C.). After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press this application and wants liberty to file appropriate application/proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction. The instant application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file appropriate application/proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction. Office shall return the certified copy of the orders to the learned counsel for the applicant, after retaining a xerox of the same. Order Date :- 21.8.2025 T. Sinha Digitally signed by :- TRIPTI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad