RAJDHAR OJHA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
CRLA/7108/2025 · 2025-08-12
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 84129 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 84129 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:137773 Court No. - 83 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 7108 of 2025 Appellant :- Rajdhar Ojha And 2 Others Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Appellant :- Vinod Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
1. Heard Mr.Vinod Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. Ankit Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record.
2. The present criminal appeal has been filed against the impugned summoning order dated 24.01.2025 along with entire proceeding in Complaint No. 168 of 2024 (Ram raj Vs. Rajdhar Ojha and others), under Sections 406, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(2)(Va) SC/ST Act, Station- Handiya, District- Prayagraj.
3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. The impugned summoning order passed by the learned Special Judge SC/ST Act, is totally illegal, perverse and arbitrary in nature and is liable to be set aside.
4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. opposed the submissions made by learned counsel for the appellants and have submitted that there is no infirmity or illegality in the impugned order.
5. I have considered the rival submissions made by the
learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the entire record including the impugned order carefully.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the gravity of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, specific allegations levelled against the appellants, this Court is of the opinion that there is no illegality or perversity in the impugned summoning
order and the appeal deserves to be dismissed.
7. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
8. The appellant is directed to appear/surrender before the court below concerned and apply for bail, the same shall be heard and disposed of expeditiously by the court below, in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 13.8.2025 Krishna* Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad