Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8412 (PNJ)

OM PARKASH MIDDHA v. ANINDITA MITRA AND OTHERS

COCP/5494/2025 · 2026-07-28

Vikas Suri

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 103 COCP-5494-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.07.2026 Om Parkash Middha ...Petitioner Versus Anindita Mitra and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Ms. Meena Bansal, Advocate for Mr. K.K. Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Adesh Pal Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. APS Sekhon, Advocate for respondent No.4. ***** VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed for initiating proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for alleged wilful disobedience of order dated 14.05.2025 (Annexure P-1), passed by this Court in CWP-13656-2025. 2. Learned State counsel has filed compliance affidavit dated 28.07.2026 of Sakatar Singh Bal, PCS, Director School Education (Secondary), Punjab, and appended therewith is speaking order dated 05.03.2026 (Annexure R-1), purported to have been filed in compliance of the aforesaid order dated 14.05.2025. The same is taken on record and a copy thereof has been furnished to learned counsel opposite. SUMIT KUMAR 2026.07.29 16:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment COCP-5494-2025 (O&M) -2- 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after perusing the aforesaid affidavit, submits that since substantial compliance has been made, the grievance of the petitioner does not survive. She, thus, prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to challenge the speaking order dated 05.03.2026 (Annexure R-1), in accordance with law. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. (VIKAS SURI) July 28, 2026 JUDGE sumit.k Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether Reportable : Yes / No SUMIT KUMAR 2026.07.29 16:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment