[2025:RJ-JP:8674] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2819/2025 Vikas Urf Vicky S/o Shri Ramkuvaar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Ladi Ka Bas, Police Station Patan District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present Petitioner Is Confined In Sab Jail Neemkathana). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 27/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.237/2024 registered at Police Station Patan (Sikar), District Neem ka Thana for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) & 109(1) of BNS and Section 3/25 of Arms Act. Later on, police filed charge- sheet in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5), 109(1) & 332(b) of BNS and Sections 3/25 & 27(1) of Arms Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that all the injuries sustained to the injured are simple in nature. Counsel further submits that petitioner is in custody since 15.10.2024. Further custody of the petitioner would [2025:RJ-JP:8674] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2819/2025] not serve any fruitful purpose. Charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. She submits that petitioner is habitual offender as four other cases have been registered against him. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the nature of injuries sustained to the injured; charge-sheet has been filed in this matter; looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Vikas Urf Vicky S/o Shri Ramkuvaar, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned [2025:RJ-JP:8674] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2819/2025] police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /28