Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84109 (ALL)

COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT OF DAYANAND SIKSHA SAMITI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/26591/2025 · 2025-08-07

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:134552 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26591 of 2025 Petitioner :- Committee Of Management Of Dayanand Siksha Samiti And Another Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Naresh Chandra Tripathi,Suchita Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following relief:- "i.Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondent no. 2 to decide and certify the valid list of 21 life members of the general body of the Society submitted by petitioners in exercise of his power conferred under Section 4-B of the Society Registration Act, 1860 as amended in U.P. by U.P. Act No. 23 of 2013, within the short stipulated period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court after due notice to respondent no. 3 by respondent no. 2. " 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no.2 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Sri Santosh Kumar, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner as no objection made by learned standing counsel. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 Deputy Registrar, Firms, Societies and Chits, Kanpur Division, Kanpur within 10 days. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no.2 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 8.8.2025 AKT (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad