Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:144682 Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 27225 of 2025 Applicant :- Reshma And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vishveshwar Mani Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material brought on record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. The applicants are not named in the F.I.R. The names of applicants came into light in the statements of named accused. Two other co-accused, Mamta and Samsudeen alias Masudeen have already been enlarged on bail and as the case of applicants is not on the worse footing than that of the aforesaid co-accused, therefore, applicants may also be enlarged on bail. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicants have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicants that they are ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make themselves available before the court whenever required and are also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon them. He next submits that the applicants are in jail since 25.06.2025, with no previous criminal history. 3. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicants but he could not dispute the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant. 4. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence and without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed. 5. Let the applicant-Reshma and Guddi @ Buddhi, be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 244 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 338, 336(3), 317(2), 61(2), 318(4) of B.N.S., Police Station- Geeda, District- Gorakhpur, on executing a personal each bond and furnishing two local sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: i) Applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence. ii) Applicants shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses. iii) Applicants shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court. iv) Applicants shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission. v) Applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 6. In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, the court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of applicants in accordance with law. Order Date :- 22.8.2025 Mustaqeem. Digitally signed by :- MOHD MUSTAQEEM KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad