Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84061 (ALL)

SUJEET KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/26692/2025 · 2025-08-22

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:145800 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26692 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sujeet Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Subedar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- Avneesh Tripathi,C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayers:- "(I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of Mandamus direct the respondent concerned to ensure verification of documents with regards to validity of Bachelor in Education Mark Sheets, being Enrollment No.9981954 and Roll No.2105470208 completed in the year of Session 2022-23 and 2023- 24 by the petitioner, from college R.E.I.T. Vidya Peeth Pohali, Sardhana Road, Meerut which is affiliated with Chaudhary Charan Singh University Meerut. (II) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of Mandamus direct the respondent no.2 to decide the representation dated 11.12.2024 moved by the petitioner, within stipulated time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.3 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos. 2 and 3 vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Avneesh Tripathi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.2 and 3, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.2 and 3. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.3 within 10 days from today. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.3, Examination Controller Chaudhary Charan Singh University Meerut is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 23.8.2025 Radhika (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad