CWP-23194 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Sukhbir Singh and another State of Punjab and CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. under Article 226 Mandamus upon leave encashment, in terms of 06.05.2025 (Annexures P revised installment of leave encashment along with interest @ 12%. 2. submits that regards their grievances, with the legal notice dated 05.12.2025 (Annexure P satisfied in case, a direction is passed upon abovesaid 3. 23194-2026 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sukhbir Singh and another Versus State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. K.K.Thakur, Advocate, and Mr. Sunny Khullar, Advocate, Mr. Paras S. Khindri, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (Oral) The petitioners, by way of instant writ petition, as cast under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, Mandamus upon the respondents to release the revised installments of leave encashment, in terms of the revised pay 06.05.2025 (Annexures P-6 and P-7), and also remit arrears of first revised installment of leave encashment along with interest @ 12%. At the outset, learned counsel for submits that the petitioners have already served the respondents, as regards their grievances, with the legal notice dated 05.12.2025 (Annexure P-10). Therefore, he submits that satisfied in case, a direction is passed upon abovesaid legal notice. Notice of motion. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-23194-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.07.2026 ….Petitioners ….Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI K.K.Thakur, Advocate, and , Advocate, Mr. Paras S. Khindri, Advocate, , by way of instant writ petition, as cast of the Constitution of India, pray for issuance of a release the revised installments of revised pay fixation orders dated 7), and also remit arrears of first revised installment of leave encashment along with interest @ 12%. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners fairly ready served the respondents, as regards their grievances, with the legal notice dated 05.12.2025 10). Therefore, he submits that, at this stage, they would be satisfied in case, a direction is passed upon the respondents to decide the .2026 s , by way of instant writ petition, as cast of a release the revised installments of fixation orders dated 7), and also remit arrears of first fairly ready served the respondents, as regards their grievances, with the legal notice dated 05.12.2025 would be the AMIT KUMAR 2026.07.29 15:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-23194 4. Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the At the outset, he fairly submits that he has no objection, in case, a Mandamus is passed upon the legal notice 5. prayer has been made is disposed of, amongst the respondents, by passing a speaking order, of a certified copy of this order. Needless to assert final order, a due opportunity of hearing shall be afforded to the petitioner 6. hereinabove direction application/motion for 28.07.2026 Ak Sharma 23194-2026 (O&M) -2- Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, learned Assistant Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents At the outset, he fairly submits that he has no objection, in case, a Mandamus is passed upon the respondents legal notice (supra). In view of the above, and since a prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioner disposed of, by issuing a Mandamus upon amongst the respondents, to consider and decide the by passing a speaking order, within a period of of a certified copy of this order. Needless to assert final order, a due opportunity of hearing shall be afforded to the petitioners. However, in the event of default in compliance of the hereinabove direction, the petitioners are application/motion for revival of the instant petition. .2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Sahil R. Bakshi, learned Assistant Advocate General, respondents and waives service. At the outset, he fairly submits that he has no objection, in case, a the respondents, to take a final decision upon ince a bona fide and innocuous the petitioners, the instant writ petition by issuing a Mandamus upon the competent authority, to consider and decide the legal notice (supra), within a period of six weeks from the receipt of a certified copy of this order. Needless to assert that before drawing a final order, a due opportunity of hearing shall be afforded to the in the event of default in compliance of the are at liberty to move an apt revival of the instant petition. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE Yes Yes/No Sahil R. Bakshi, learned Assistant Advocate General, and waives service. At the outset, he fairly submits that he has no objection, in case, a , to take a final decision upon innocuous , the instant writ petition the competent authority, (supra), from the receipt that before drawing a final order, a due opportunity of hearing shall be afforded to the in the event of default in compliance of the at liberty to move an apt AMIT KUMAR 2026.07.29 15:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document