APHC010090182025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 5810/2025 Between: Gurakala Keshava Reddy and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. GOUTHAMI SURAPAREDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 5810/2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs:- “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more specifically 4th respondent in trying to dispossess the petitioners from their respective land admeasuring Ac.0.035 cents in Sy.No.182-1B-11 Plot No.1, AC.0.035 cents in 182-1B-12 Plot No 1 and Ac.0.035 cents in Sy.No.182-1B-13 Plot No.1 situated in Kappalabanda village, Puttaparthi Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District, without issuing any notice and without following due procedure of law is illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and property rights as guaranteed under Article 300- A of Constitution of India and pass such other order.” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the 4th respondent assigned the land admeasuring to an extent of Ac.0.035 cents each in Sy.No.182-1B-11 Plot No.1, situated at Kappalabanda Village, Puttaparthi Mandal, Satya Sai District in favour of the petitioners vide proceedings dated 23.05.2008 respectively. Since then, the petitioners are in peaceful possession and enjoyment of their respective subject properties. Now the petitioners are raising an RCC building in their subject lands and the petitioners also obtained building permission from the Gram Panchayat. While things stood 3 thus, the 4th respondent is not allowing the petitioners to proceed with their construction and trying to interfere with the petitioners’ possession. Hence, the present Writ Petition. 4. Learned Government Pleader for the respondents submits that if the respondent authority intent to interfere or dispossess the petitioners from the subject property, they will follow due process of law. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents and on perusal of the material placed on record, this Court is of the considered opinion the present Writ Petition can be disposed of directing the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners’ subject properties, without follow due process of law. 6. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 10.03.2025 TTPPSS 4 104 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 5810 of 2025 10.03.2025 TTPPSS