- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24894 WP NO.8047 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.8047 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. G.N. RADHAMMA W/O B.R. SRINIVASA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT BYRADENAHALLI VILLAGE, KUDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. V.F. KUMBAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE TAHSILDAR DEVANAHALLI TALUK DEVANAHALLI - 562 110. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH BABURAO, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION MADE BY THE PETITIONER ON 12TH OCTOBER, 2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-E TO EFFECT MUTATION ENTRIES IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24894 WP NO.8047 OF 2025 THE LAND BEARING SURVEY NO.60 MEASURING 15 GUNTAS OF BYRADENAHALLI VILLAGE, KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Sri. Siddharth Baburao, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondent No.2-Tahsildar to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 12th October, 2022 (Annexure-E) filed for effecting mutation entries in the name of the petitioner in respect the land bearing Survey No.60 measuring 15 guntas of Byradenahalli Village, Kundana Hobli, Devanahallai Taluk. 3. Heard Sri. V.F. Kumabar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Siddharth Baburao, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents. 4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on perusal of the writ petition, same would indicate that the land in question has been granted in favour the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24894 WP NO.8047 OF 2025 petitioner. In that view of the matter, respondent No.2- Tahsildar is directed to consider the case of the petitioner and take decision, after examining the entire records pertaining to the grant said to have been made in favour of the petitioner in accordance with law, within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of this order. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25