Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84007 (ALL)

SOHAIL AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/26572/2025 · 2025-08-07

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:134725 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26572 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sohail Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Himanshu Pandey,Sunil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 30.05.2025 passed by the City Magistrate (Annexure no. 11 to the writ petition)" 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that proceedings under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 was concluded against which private respondents had moved a restoration application which was dismissed. Thereafter, an appeal has been filed under Section 24(4) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which is pending consideration. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, requiring the appellate court to conclude the appellate proceedings, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. Order Date :- 8.8.2025 V.S.Singh Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad