Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84003 (KAR)

SRI PARAMASHIVAIAH v. SMT R P DAKSHAYANAMMA

RPFC/269/2024 · 2025-07-23

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI RPFC NO.269 OF 2024 BETWEEN SRI PARAMASHIVAIAH, S/O LATE RUDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT RAMALINGAPURA POST, RAMALINGAPURA, BUKKAPATTANA HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 115. ... PETITIONER/S (By SRI/SMT.: MANJUNATH T. M., ADVOCATE) AND SMT. R. P. DAKSHAYANAMMA, W/O PARAMASHIVAIAH. R, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT YARAGUNTESHWARA NIVASA, NEAR OLD KAVERI SCHOOL, SHANTHINAGARA, TUMAKURU - 572 102. ... RESPONDENT/S …2 RPFC 269/2024 2 RPFC FILED UNDER SEC.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 25.09.2024 PASSED IN CRL. MISC NO.224/2023 ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, TUMAKURU., PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC.125 OF Cr.P.C., FOR MAINTENANCE. This RPFC coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order. ORAL ORDER A week's time is granted to comply with the office objections. By that time, if the office objections are not complied with, the petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Vide Court Order dated 23.07.2025, the office objections are not complied with. Hence, the petition is hereby dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : SR R By : VS C By : GS Ty Dt : 08.12.2025 C.Dt : 16.12.2025