NAVIN SINGH RANA v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/11364/2025 · 2025-09-08
Ajit Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 83976 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 83976 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 11364 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. Instructions obtained today by learned Standing Counsel is taken on record. A copy of the instructions is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. As per the instructions brought on record on 17.06.2025 the village concerned has come to be notified under Section 4(a)2 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act and now the consolidation proceedings have to be carried out in the village concerned for which the petitioner has been posted as Consolidator by way of transfer. In the circumstances, I see no justification to interfere in the order impugned. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved by the order and wants transfer to any other place of his choice and if there is availability of any vacancy at his desired station, he may make a representation for the same within a period of two weeks from today along with the certified copy of this order, and if he does so, the same shall be considered and disposed of by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of two months. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition stands disposed of.
September 9, 2025 IrfanUddin Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Ajit Kumar,J.) Navin Singh Rana .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- IRFAN UDDIN SIDDIKI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad