Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83973 (ALL)

SANJEEV KUMAR AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/17393/2025 · 2025-09-03

Santosh Rai, Siddharth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17393 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J. HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J. Short counter affidavit filed by learned counsel for the respondent no,3 is taken on record. Heard Shri Brijesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Anil Kumar Bind holding brief of Shri Ajay Kumar Maurya,learned counsel for the respondent no.3. It has been averred in paragraph-3 of the short counter affidavit that parties have settled their dispute out side the court.Their divorce petition under section 13 B of Hindu Marriage Act has been filed. Learned counsel for the respondent no.3 does not wishes to proceed with the case. In view of the above, impugned F.I.R is quashed. The writ petition is allowed. Investigating Officer of this case is directed to make entry of this order in the case diary. Let the order be communicated to the S.P. Mainpuri, by the Registrar (Compliance) within 10 days. September 4, 2025 Atul kr. sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ajay Kumar Maurya, G.A. (Santosh Rai,J.) (Siddharth,J.) Sanjeev Kumar And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad