BRIJ KRISHAN KOUL AND ORS v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (REVENUE) AND ORS
CM(M)/299/2025 · 2025-07-30
Vinod Chatterji Koul
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8397 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8397 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 119 Suppl. Cause List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CM(M) No. 299/2025
Brij Krishan Koul and Ors. …Appellant/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Syed Wasiq Ahmad, Advocate Vs. UT of J&K and Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
O R D E R 30.07.2025 When a query was put to learned counsel for the petitioner that how this petition is maintainable, he prays for withdrawal of instant petition with liberty to take recourse to the remedy as may be available to him under law. His statement is taken on record. In view of statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 30.07.2025 Manzoor
Manzoor Ul Hassan Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Srinagar 30.07.2025 16:09