Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83963 (MAD)

V.KOTEESWARI v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/32493/2025 · 2025-09-04

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.32493 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 04.09.2025 Coram The Hon'ble Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy W.P.No.32493 of 2024 V.Koteeswari ...Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Collector, Tiruvallur District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruttani, Tiruvallur District. 3. The Tasildar, Tiruttani Taluk, Tiruvallur District. 4.Mr.Koteeswaran ....Respondents Prayer: This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, seeking for a direction to the respondents to take action based upon the petitioners representation dated 05.07.2025 and consequently direct the respondents to immediately stop the attempt of construction of compound wall at 26-feet metal road leading to east-West comprised in S.No.306/13, Agoor Village, Tiruttani Taluk, Tiruvallur District. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.32493 of 2024 For Petitioner : Ms.Jayasri.R. For Respondents : Mr.D.Ravichander (R1 to R3) Special Government Pleader *** ORDER Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. With consent, the main Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to take action based upon the petitioners representation dated 05.07.2025 and consequently direct the respondents to immediately stop the attempt of construction of compound wall at 26-feet metal road leading to east- West comprised in S.No.306/13, Agoor Village, Tiruttani Taluk, Tiruvallur District. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the 4th respondent is owning a temple in S.No.306/13 and he is making attempt to construct the compound wall in the Government Poromboke land obstructing the 20 feet public road which will cause hindrance to the petitioner to reach her agricultural lands. In this regard, she made a representation to the respondents on 05.07.2025. As the same did not evoke any response, the petitioner has come forward with this writ petition seeking for the aforesaid relief. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.32493 of 2024 4. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for jthe respondents would submit that the respondents will pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 05.07.2025, on merits and in accordance with law, within the stipulated period. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without going into the merits of the case, this Court directs the respondent concerned to pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 05.07.2025, on merits and in accordance with law, after issuing notice to the petitioner and the fourth respondent herein and also affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, the fourth respondent herein as well as any of the interested parties, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the decision taken to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 04.09.2025 Speaking/Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No arr 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.32493 of 2024 To 1. The District Collector, Tiruvallur District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruttani, Tiruvallur District. 3. The Tasildar, Tiruttani Taluk, Tiruvallur District. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.32493 of 2024 Krishnan Ramasamy,J., arr W.P.No.32493 of 2025 04.09.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis