Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83954 (ALL)

MUNNI DEVI ALIAS LALI DEVI AND 3 OTHERS v. KM. POONAM AND 14 OTHERS

A227/8723/2025 · 2025-08-07

Manish Kumar Nigam

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:134377 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8723 of 2025 Petitioner :- Munni Devi Alias Lali Devi And 3 Others Respondent :- Km. Poonam And 14 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suresh Kumar Gupta Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "Issue a order or direction, directing the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jalaun, District Jalaun at Orai to decide the temporary injunction 6C in O.S. No.86/2020, Munni Devi alias Lali Devi and others Vs. Km. Poonam and others as well as O.S. No.86/2020, Munni Devi alias Lali Devi and others Vs. Km. Poonam, pending since 27.05.2020 before the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jalaun, District Jalaun at Orai and if possible, during pendency of the 6C application or this present petition, contesting respondents may be directed to maintain status quo on the spot ie. 1 / (3 ^ (nd)) share of gata no. 213 (area 0.913 hectare), gata no. 090 (area 0.918 hectare), 2/3th share of gata no. 218-Ga (area 0.6680 hectare), 1 / (9 ^ (0h)) share of gata no. 566-Ka (area 0.328 hectare), 1 / (3 ^ n) share of gata no. 468 (area 0.664 hectare), 1 / (3 ^ (rd)) share of khasra no. 258 (area 0.393 hectare), 2/9th share of gata no. 321 (area 0.113 hectare) and gata no. 533- Kha (area 0.0890 hectare), gata no. 566-Ka (area 0.3280 hectare), gata no. 449 (area 0.0450 hectare), gata no. 566-Ga (area 0.240 hectare), situated at Village Majeeth, Pargana Madhavgarh, District Jalaun." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending since 2020 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jalaun, District Jalaun at Orai to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 8.8.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad