- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39519 WP No. 7630 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.7630 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SABIHA PARVEEN D/O SYAD KHARAR MOINUDDIN AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT NO.16/5, 5TH MAIN, 5TH CROSS, PATEL DOWN, RAHAMATH NAGAR, R.T.NAGAR POST, BENGALURU -560032. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DHANANJAYA C.P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DISTRICT, BENGALURU -560009. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH SUB DIVISION, Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39519 WP No. 7630 of 2023 BENGALURU - 560009. 4. THASILDAR (ADDITIONAL) BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU -560 064. 5. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER YALAHANKA TALUK PANCHAYATH YALAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU -560 004. 6. THE PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER VADEERAHALLI GRAMA PANCHAYATH YALAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU -560 064. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO WITHDRAW THE LETTER DATED 24.11.2022, ANNEXURE-H ISSUED BY THE R4 AND TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS MADE BY THE PETITIONER'S SON DATED 01.02.2023 TO THE RESPONDENTS NO.2 AND 4, THE COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-F AND G. AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.5 TO ENTER THE PETITIONER'S NAME IN THE KHATHA BOOK AS PER THE HAKKU PARTA OF THE PETITIONER AS MENTIONED IN ANNEXURE-C. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39519 WP No. 7630 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Despite having been granted sufficient time, the learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to comply with the office objections. By order dated 03.03.2025, this Court had granted a final opportunity of one week to rectify the said objections, with a clear direction that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the petition. This non-compliance indicates that the petitioner has no genuine intent to diligently pursue the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- compliance with office objections. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10