1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE & SRI. P.D. SUBRAMANYA, MEMBER W.P.No.9105/2021 (Lok Adalath No.8062/2025) BETWEEN 1 . BANGALORE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION SUBHASH NAGAR, CENTRAL OFFICE, BANGALORE BY ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, REP. BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER ...PETITIONER (BY SMT H R RENUKA, ADVOCATE) AND 1 . N. MANJUNATHA S/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/OMOHAMMEDPURA VILLAGE, CHOWDARAHALLI POST, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT 563125 ...RESPONDENT (BY SRI SHEKAR L, ADVOCATE) 2 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE AWARD OF THE PRINCIPAL LABOUR COURT, BENGALURU IN REF NO.19/2017 DTD 27.08.2019 VIDE ANXN-F. THE PETITION COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER The writ petition is filed assailing the award dated 27.08.2019 in Ref. No.19/2017 on the file of Principal Labour Court, Bengaluru. The award is questioned by the Corporation. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent are present. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner-Corporation and the learned counsel for the respondent-workman jointly submit that the dispute is settled and the parties have reduced the terms of the settlement in the joint memo. 4. The joint memo reads as under:- "JOINT MEMO The WP filed against the award in Ref No.19/2017 Dated 27/8/2019 on the file of the Principal Labour Court, BENGALURU has been settled between the parties on the following terms and the award be modified as under: 1. The Petitioner-Corporation to reinstate the workman into service as fresh trainee. 2. Petitioner is not entitled for any relief like arrears, continuity of service, consequential benefits. Further he is also not entitled for any wages from the date of award till his reinstatement as fresh trainee. 3. If Respondent remains absent after reporting to the duty, stringent action will be initiated against the respondent/second party". 3 5. The joint memo is taken on record. 6. This Court has perused the terms of the settlement. This Court does not find any impediment to accept the terms of the settlement. Accordingly, the impugned award dated 27.08.2019 in Ref. No.19/2017 on the file of Principal Labour Court, Bengaluru is modified in terms of the joint memo. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER CHS