- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27794 RSA No. 702 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.702 OF 2022 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. PARVATHAMMA, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, W/O LATE SHIVANNA. 2. NANJUNDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O LATE SHIVANNA, DEAD BY LRS. MALLAMMA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, W/O NANJUNDAIAH. 3. NAYANA, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, D/O NANJUNDAIAH. 4. RAJESHA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S/O SHIVANNA. ALL ARE RESIDENT OF HERURU, KASABA HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT – 572 219. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. JAGADISH BALIGA N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. DODDAMMA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, W/O RANGASWAMAIAH. Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27794 RSA No. 702 of 2022 2. RAMESHA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, S/O RANGASWAMAIAH. 3. GANGADHARA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O RANGASWAMAIAH. 4. MANJUNATHA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, S/O RANGASWAMAIAH. 5. VARUNKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, S/O RANGASWAMAIAH. 6. KALPANA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, W/O MANJUNATH. 7. THARA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, D/O RANGASWAMAIAH. R1 TO R7 ARE RESIDING AT HERURU COLONY, HERURU, KASABA HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 219. 8. NAGARATHNA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, W/O RANGASWAMAIAH, R/AT BOPENAHALLI, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 227. 9. SUJATHA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, W/O SHANKARAPPA. 10. GOWRAMMA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, W/O MAHALINGAIAH. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27794 RSA No. 702 of 2022 11. RAMESHA H.M., AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, S/O MAHALINGAIAH. 12. GIRIRAJA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, W/O CHANNABASAVAIAH. R9 TO R12 RESIDENT OF HERURU, KASABA HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 219. 13. PREMAKUMARI, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, W/O GURUPRASAD, R/O CHANNIGANAPALYA, HEBBUR HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 120. 14. SUMITHRA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, D/O SHIVANNA, RESIDENT OF HERURU, KASABA HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 219. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.02.2022 PASSED IN R.A.NO.21/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, GUBBI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE ORDER DATED 26.02.2021 PASSED IN FDP NO.22/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JDUGE AND JMFC, GUBBI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 54 OF CPC. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27794 RSA No. 702 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellants submits that the parties are not co-operating to comply with the office objections and hence he could not pay the cost and could not comply with the office objections. 2. The matter is listed for the fifth time for non- compliance of the office objections. In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the appellants, the appeal is dismissed for non-payment of cost and non-compliance of the office objections. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13