Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8394 (ALL)

SHRINATH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/864/2025 · 2025-03-05

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:32630 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 864 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shrinath Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhaiya Lal Yadav,Dinesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus to competent respondent for consideration of appointment of his son on compassionate ground because he is suffering from 80% physical disability. 3. He submitted that the matter was forwarded however nothing further transpired in the matter. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has obtained instructions in the matter as per the instructions earlier there was a ban imposed upon the rights of those physically disabled persons whose son could be offered compassionate appointment in home guard services but now that ban has been lifted and petitioner's matter, as per the instructions, is under consideration. 5. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the respondent No. 3 is the competent authority in the matter. 6. In view of the above, petitioner is directed to approach respondent No. 3/ District Commandant of Home Guard, Jaunpur along with the certified copy of this order within three weeks from today and in the event he approaches the authority the authority will take into consideration the claim of compassionate appointment of petitioner in accordance with law and will be passing appropriate orders in that regard within a further period of two months. 7. The petition, thus, stands disposed of. Order Date :- 6.3.2025 Nadeem Digitally signed by :- NADEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad