[2025:RJ-JP:30511] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 141/2002 1. Mohan Singh S/o Shri Kalyan Singh, aged about 50 years, Resident of Vill & Post Diggi (Baggar) Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. 2. Naraian Singh S/o Shri Madho Singh, aged about 34 years, Resident of Vill & Post Diggi (Baggar) Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. 3. Dildar Khan S/o Shri Ushman Khan, aged about 31 years, Resident of Vill & Post Diggi, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. 4. Panchu Lal Saini S/o Shri Panchu Lal Saini, aged about 37 years, Resident of Vill & Post Diggi, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. 5. Mahboob Shah S/o Shri Ilai Shah, aged about 33 years, Resident of Vill & Post Diggi, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. 6. Heera Lal Bhat S/o Shri Khema Ram Bhatt, aged about 37 years, Resident of Vill & Post Diggi, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. 7. Satyanaraian Sharma S/o Shri Sheonand Sharma, aged about 34 years, Resident of Village Nimbho ria, Via Tordi, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. 8. Bhanwar Lal Daroga S/o Shri Harchanda Daroga, aged about 30 years, Resident of Vill & Post Tilanju, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. 9. Gopal Lal Gurjar S/o Shri Ridhkaran Gurjar, aged about 35 years, Resident of Vill & Post Rindlya, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. 10. Gopal Lal Jat S/o Shri Ridhkaran Jat, aged about 35 years, Resident of Vill & Post Hindola, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. 11. Roop Naraian Daroga S/o Shri Mangi Lal Daroga, aged about 36 years, Resident of Vill & Post Hindola, Via Indoli, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. 12. Satyanaraian Sharma S/o Shri Hansraj Sharma, aged about 43 years, Resident of Vill & Post Jharli, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. 13. Abdul Shakur S/o Shri Peer Mohammed, aged about 40 years, Resident of Vill & Post Hathki, Via Rajpura, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. 14. Youshuf Mohammed S/o Shri led Mohammed, aged about 33 years, Resident of Vill & Post Lamba Hari Singh, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. 15. Amar Lal Gurjar S/o Shri Harchand Gurjar, aged about 38 years, Resident of Vill & Post Sangrampura, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. 16. Amar Lal Gurjar S/o Shri Ramkaran Gurjar, aged about 36 years, Resident of Vill & Post Surajpura, Via Jharli, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. 17. Mangi Lal Swami S/o Shri Ratan Das Swami, aged about 36 years, Resident of Vill & Post Junardar, Via Jharli, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. 18. Hariram Swami S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal Swami, aged about 36 years, Resident of Vill & Post Lamba Harisingh, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk. ----Petitioners [2025:RJ-JP:30511] (2 of 3) [CW-141/2002] Versus 1. The Chief Secretary, Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Secretary to the Government of Rajasthan Rural Development & Panchayat Raj Department, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Director, Rural Development & Panchayat Raj Department, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 4. Secretary to the Government of Rajasthan, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 07/08/2025 1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners, even in the second round. 2. I have examined the memo of writ petition as well as reply thereto filed by the respondents. 3. Petitioners have prayed for a direction against the respondents to grant all kinds of leaves, leave for further studies, encashment of leave, travelling allowance, promotional avenues, selection scale on completion of 9, 18 and 27 years of service, medical facilities and all other benefits etc. with effect from the date of their regular appointment for which they are legally entitled to being regular employees of the Panchayati Raj Department. 4. In reply to the writ petition, it has been stated that services of the petitioners have been regularized with effect from 01.01.1996 and since then, they have been getting benefit of regular pay scale and other benefits. The prayer made in the writ [2025:RJ-JP:30511] (3 of 3) [CW-141/2002] petition also reveals that the relief claimed by the petitioners can be granted only from the date of regular appointment of the petitioners. The petitioners were regularly appointed with effect from 01.01.1996 and as per the reply filed by the respondents, since 01.01.1996, they have been granted all the benefits of a regular employee. 5. Hence, I do not find any ground to interfere in the instant writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /11