IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83397 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-191 Year-2024 Thana- PIPRA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. Dinesh Bhagat S/o- Late Rambahadur Bhagat Village- Bishunpura Ps-Pipra District- East Champaran 2. Bappi Kumar S/o- Dinesh Bhagat Village- Bishunpura Ps-Pipra District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Anita Kumari, APP For the Informant : Mr. Bal Govind Sharma, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 27-01-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 303(2), 352, 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.. 3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 23.07.2024 at about 6:30AM, a Panchayati was going on between the informant and these petitioners at the door of one Shivchandra Bhagat and during the same, these petitioners assaulted informant by means of Farsa and iron rod as a result of which informant sustained injuries on his head. It is further alleged that co-accused Satyam Kumar snatched gold chain and earrings from mother of informant, co-accused Gudiya Devi snatched Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83397 of 2024(3) dt.27-01-2025 2/3 gold chain from neck of informant and co-accused Mohan Bhagat took cash worth Rs. 21,000/- from pocket of informant. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. As a matter of fact, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, due to a petty dispute, a simple maar-peet took place between the parties. Doctor has found the injuries sustained by the injured to be simple in nature. Petitioner No. 1 has got two criminal antecedents in which he is already on bail and Petitioner No. 2 has got no criminal antecedents. 5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and nature of injuries sustained by the injured, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to these petitioners is allowed. 7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83397 of 2024(3) dt.27-01-2025 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Sadar at Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No.191 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S.. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T