- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45231 WP No. 30803 of 2018 C/W WP No. 30804 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 30803 OF 2018 (LB-BMP) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 30804 OF 2018 (LB-BMP) IN WP No. 30803/2018 BETWEEN: SMT. YASHODAMMA W/O. SRI. GOVINDARAJU, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT NO.38, 2ND MAIN, 4TH CROSS, VITTALNAGAR, CHAMRAJAPET, BENGALURU-560018. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ROOPESHA B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N.R.SQUARE, BANGALORE-560001. 2. ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER CHAMRAJAPET SUB-DIVISION, BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, BANGALORE-560018 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.V.MURALIDHAR, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN CASE Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45231 WP No. 30803 of 2018 C/W WP No. 30804 of 2018 NO.¸À.PÁ.C(ZÁ.¥ÉÃ)¸À.E./¹.N/08/15-16 FROM THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 11.09.2015 AND QUASH NOTICES ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 321(3) OF KMC ACT DATED 11.09.2015 VIDE ¸À.PÁ.C(ZÁ.¥ÉÃ)¸À.E./¹.N/08/15-16 VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND THE JUDGMENT DATED 31.01.2018 IN APPEAL NO.944/2015 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL VIDE ANNEXURE-H. IN WP NO. 30804/2018 BETWEEN: SMT. YASHODAMMA W/O SRI. GOVINDARAJU, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT NO.38, 2ND MAIN, 4TH CROSS, VITTALNAGAR, CHAMRAJAPET, BENGALURU-560018. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. ROOPESHA B.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N.R.SQUARE, BANGALORE-560001. 2. ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER CHAMRAJAPET SUB-DIVISION, BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, BANGALORE-560018 ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.H.PRASHANTH, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN CASE NO.¸À.PÁ.C(ZÁ.¥ÉÃ)¸À.E./¹.N/07/15-16 FROM THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45231 WP No. 30803 of 2018 C/W WP No. 30804 of 2018 11.09.2015 AND QUASH NOTICES ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 321(3) OF KMC ACT DATED 11.09.2015 VIDE ¸À.PÁ.C(ZÁ.¥ÉÃ)¸À.E./¹.N/07/15-16 VIDE ANNEXURE-H AND THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.01.2018 IN APPEAL NO.945/2015 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL VIDE ANNEXURE-K. THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER The petitioner who is common in both these petitions has challenged an order bearing No.¸À.PÁ.C(ZÁ.¥ÉÃ)¸À.E./¹.N/08/15-16 dated 11.09.2015 issued by respondent No.2. She has also challenged the judgment dated 31.01.2018 passed in Appeal Nos.944/2015 and 945/2015 repsectively by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal. 2. The petitioner/Smt. Yashodamma who is common in both these petitions was served with a notice under Sections 321(1) and 321(2) followed by an order dated 11.09.2015 under Section 321(3) of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976. She challenged the same before the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal in Appeal Nos.944/2015 and 945/2015 respectively - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45231 WP No. 30803 of 2018 C/W WP No. 30804 of 2018 which were dismissed. Hence, she is therefore before this Court. 3. When this petition was listed on 30.10.2025, the following order was passed: Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the petitions for some time, submitted that the petitioner, who is common in both these petitions, has stopped the construction on the respective properties involved in these petitions. He submits that the petitioner would file an application to amalgamate the respective properties involved in these petitions and for issuance of a fresh plan. He, therefore, submits that a direction be issued to the respondents to consider the application of the petitioner for amalgamation of the respective properties involved in these petitions and for issuance of a fresh plan. In order to enable the petitioner to file an appropriate application for amalgamation of the respective properties involved in these petitions and to file an application for a fresh plan after amalgamation, list these petitions on 07.11.2025. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner now submits that the petitioner has not filed an application for amalgamation - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45231 WP No. 30803 of 2018 C/W WP No. 30804 of 2018 of the respective properties involved in these petitions and for issuance of a fresh plan. 5. In that view of the matter, since there is no serious challenge to the violations reported by the respondents, no indulgence can be shown to the petitioner in these petitions. 6. However, if the petitioner desires to save the building, constructed by her, she may file applications for amalgamation of both the properties within two months from today and also for sanction of a plan. 7. If the petitioner in these petitions fails to avail this opportunity, the respondents shall take necessary steps for demolishing the structures already put up by the petitioner. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27